<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Worse XLSX preformance after update to 3.13.0]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hello. We recently updated from 2.10.0 to 3.13.0. We had some reports written in XLSX. Rendering times got severely worse after the update. Here are some measurements:<br />
The tables have around 206000 rows when everything is rendered.<br />
XLS 2.10.0 - 19 sec<br />
XLS 3.13.0 - 1 min<br />
XLS template 3.13.0 - 2min<br />
I am sending you some sample code on the playgrounds:<br />
The written XLSX is under the EXCEL_sample on this playground: <a href="https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/0RJEPt1Q" rel="nofollow">https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/0RJEPt1Q</a><br />
The XLSX template is under DelovneUre on this playground: <a href="https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/iUly8ySv" rel="nofollow">https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/iUly8ySv</a></p>
<p>Am I missing something? We updated to 3.13.0 for preformance reasons and now the XLSX preforms worse. We were hoping we could replace the hand written XLSX reports with XLSX templates.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.jsreport.net/topic/2912/worse-xlsx-preformance-after-update-to-3-13-0</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 01:10:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.jsreport.net/topic/2912.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 11:15:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worse XLSX preformance after update to 3.13.0 on Invalid Date]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hello. We recently updated from 2.10.0 to 3.13.0. We had some reports written in XLSX. Rendering times got severely worse after the update. Here are some measurements:<br />
The tables have around 206000 rows when everything is rendered.<br />
XLS 2.10.0 - 19 sec<br />
XLS 3.13.0 - 1 min<br />
XLS template 3.13.0 - 2min<br />
I am sending you some sample code on the playgrounds:<br />
The written XLSX is under the EXCEL_sample on this playground: <a href="https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/0RJEPt1Q" rel="nofollow">https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/0RJEPt1Q</a><br />
The XLSX template is under DelovneUre on this playground: <a href="https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/iUly8ySv" rel="nofollow">https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/iUly8ySv</a></p>
<p>Am I missing something? We updated to 3.13.0 for preformance reasons and now the XLSX preforms worse. We were hoping we could replace the hand written XLSX reports with XLSX templates.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.jsreport.net/post/12585</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.jsreport.net/post/12585</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[AnejBradacVranc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worse XLSX preformance after update to 3.13.0 on Invalid Date]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the demos. I am a bit confused here with your terminology, but I will write down my observations.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The written XLSX is under the EXCEL_sample on this playground: <a href="https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/0RJEPt1Q" rel="nofollow">https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/0RJEPt1Q</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Here you share the <a href="https://jsreport.net/learn/html-to-xlsx" rel="nofollow">html-to-xlsx</a> template.<br />
This runs for me 23s on jsreport 2.10.0 and 17s on jsreport 3.13.0.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The XLSX template is under DelovneUre on this playground: <a href="https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/iUly8ySv" rel="nofollow">https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/iUly8ySv</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Here you share a template using <a href="https://jsreport.net/learn/xlsx" rel="nofollow">xlsx recipe</a> and a combination of <code>xlsx</code> helpers with a templating engine implemented directly in xlsx template. This template may run just on jsreport v3, because the generation part implemented directly to the excel template was added recently.</p>
<p>This template runs just 3s on jsreport 3.13.0</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.jsreport.net/post/12589</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.jsreport.net/post/12589</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worse XLSX preformance after update to 3.13.0 on Wed, 30 Aug 2023 10:59:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I apologize. The first demo that I provided you with was the wrong one. I wanted to provide you with a xlsx recipe that is written with combination of xlsx helpers. The second sample i gave you was correct (XLSX recipe made with a templating engine implemented directly in the xlsx template.<br />
I will rephrase our problem:<br />
After the update the xls recipes have drastically slower rendering times. An Identical XLSX recipe on version 2.10.0 renders faster than on 3.13.0. XLS recipes with a templating engine implemented directly in the xlsx template are additionally two times slower than the normal XLS recipes made with xlsx helpers on 3.13.0.</p>
<p>Here is the correct demo of the XLS recipe written with the help of XLS helpers that is causing us problems:<br />
It's under the name Pure_XLSX<br />
<a href="https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/0RJEPt1Q" rel="nofollow">https://playground.jsreport.net/w/AnejBradacVranc/0RJEPt1Q</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.jsreport.net/post/12590</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.jsreport.net/post/12590</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[AnejBradacVranc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 10:59:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worse XLSX preformance after update to 3.13.0 on Invalid Date]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. I compared the speed and the 3.13.0 is really slower on Pure_XLSX.<br />
However, this was already addressed and will be part of the next release coming this week.<br />
Here are the details.<br />
<a href="https://forum.jsreport.net/topic/2853/nested-each-slow-performing">https://forum.jsreport.net/topic/2853/nested-each-slow-performing</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.jsreport.net/post/12593</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.jsreport.net/post/12593</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>