<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Header image fuzzy?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi, still pretty new to everything here so please bear with me...<br />
I've figured out how to get images into my report in both the body and header and they're all showing up, which is great.<br />
My question is, has anyone had it where the header images aren't sharp? I've redone and resized the header image over and over and no matter what I do it's fuzzy/blurry and I cannot get it sharp for the life of me. I imported it in the assets section and when I created the asset, the image looked fine, but as soon as it renders in the header it's fuzzy.</p>
<p>I have other images in the body of my report and they're all sharp. I've handled all the images the same way.</p>
<p>Anyone have any experience with this?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.jsreport.net/topic/403/header-image-fuzzy</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 04:21:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.jsreport.net/topic/403.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:51:23 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Header image fuzzy? on Invalid Date]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi, still pretty new to everything here so please bear with me...<br />
I've figured out how to get images into my report in both the body and header and they're all showing up, which is great.<br />
My question is, has anyone had it where the header images aren't sharp? I've redone and resized the header image over and over and no matter what I do it's fuzzy/blurry and I cannot get it sharp for the life of me. I imported it in the assets section and when I created the asset, the image looked fine, but as soon as it renders in the header it's fuzzy.</p>
<p>I have other images in the body of my report and they're all sharp. I've handled all the images the same way.</p>
<p>Anyone have any experience with this?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.jsreport.net/post/1974</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.jsreport.net/post/1974</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hopper08]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Header image fuzzy? on Invalid Date]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>hi! can you please reproduce the problem <a href="https://playground.jsreport.net/" rel="nofollow">here in playground</a>, save it and share the link here? with that we can take a look and try to find what is happening with the image.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.jsreport.net/post/1975</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.jsreport.net/post/1975</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bjrmatos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Header image fuzzy? on Invalid Date]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi, so after playing around with things for a while I finally figured it out. Turns out I just wasn't using a large enough image. I thought it was plenty large but I guess they need to be REALLY big to render properly in the PDFs. Something kind of stupid, but at least it's fixed. Thanks anyway though =)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.jsreport.net/post/1977</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.jsreport.net/post/1977</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hopper08]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Header image fuzzy? on Invalid Date]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>you are welcome!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.jsreport.net/post/1979</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.jsreport.net/post/1979</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bjrmatos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>