Posts made by jorisdebock

ok I understand, we are currently rendering about 960.000 templates per month, averaging about 32.000 per dag. Would this also work with the "last hour"?

I do like this startup page :)

Is it possible to change the "last hour" time of green/red blocks in the config? I think I would like to configure it to like 24 hours or 1 week.

We don't use jsreport for monitoring the server and it just slows down the startup page. So no it has no value to us.

I would make it an optional feature or remove it and keep jsreport just for templating. We use a dedicated solution for monitoring our servers currently: https://checkmk.com/

On the startup page i do like:

• open profiler button
• last requests' profiles
• last edited templates

I also like these graphs, but the graphs are also a bit wonky due the time range of just 1 minute

• render requests status
• render requests durations

in v2 there was also a section for the last 5 failed requests, which would be nice. But i know i can see it in the profiler

A few questions about the "monitoring" cpu / memory of the server jsreport is running on.

1. Is the monitoring data stored indefinitely?
2. Rendering the monitoring data takes quite a while and I personally don't find the graphs that useful, is it supposed to be like this?

one of our test machine (1 node)

on our production machines (3 nodes)

fyi i kinda resolved the performance impact of loading the modules each render, not sure if this is the right way but i saw some other plugins do the same thing

  jsreport.afterConfigLoaded(reporter => {

    if (reporter.options.sandbox.allowedModules) {
      reporter.options.sandbox.modules = reporter.options.sandbox.modules || []

      reporter.options.sandbox.allowedModules.forEach(moduleName => {
        reporter.options.sandbox.modules.push({
          alias: moduleName,
          path: require.resolve(moduleName)
        })
      });
    }
  })

What is the difference in this require of the code

       if (m) {
          return require(m.path)
        }

vs this?

        if (onRequire) {
          return onRequire(moduleName, { context })
        }

Could you share more details about what you are seeing with simple html templates?

For me with html or chrome-pdf templates the jsrender step is slower with the require lines vs those lines commented out.

on my local machine for a html template
without ~100ms
with ~300ms

when I add some logging on this part of the code in runInSandbox.js, it seems that each require takes about 70ms

      requireMap: (moduleName) => {
        const m = reporter.options.sandbox.modules.find((m) => m.alias === moduleName || m.path === moduleName)

        if (m) {
          return require(m.path)
        }

        if (moduleName === 'jsreport-proxy') {
          return jsreportProxy
        }

        if (onRequire) {
// added logging
          return onRequire(moduleName, { context })
        }
      }

sandbox config

  "sandbox": {
    "allowedModules": [
      "date-fns",
      "date-fns/locale",
      "date-fns-tz"
    ],

It seems to be caused by the global shared helper when evaluating require lines

e.g.

const datefns = require('date-fns')
const datefnslocale = require('date-fns/locale')
const datefnstz = require('date-fns-tz')

jsreport-assets/lib/worker.js

          await runInSandbox(userCode, {
            filename: a.name,
            source: userCode,
            entitySet: 'assets',
            entity: {
              ...a,
              content: asset.content.toString()
            }
          })

Our setups is as follows:

• admin account to manage the users and permissions.
• One read only account for our backend application to access the api and request templates to be rendered
• Each content editor has its own user account, but currently they can not see their own or all open changes.

I would like to give the content editors also permissions to see the open changes and commit them. This way they can also double check if the changes are correct.

  "templatingEngines": {
    "strategy": "http-server"
  },

I have tested an empty template and no data, which results in the same numbers.

After upgrading to v3 I noticed a performance degradation of about 4x in rendering a html template with jsrender. How should I go about investigating this?

I am looking at the total time reported at the end e.g. "Rendering request 43 finished in 338 ms"

On a docker test environment
v2 ~90ms
v3 ~340ms

On a virtual machine test environment
v2 ~250ms
v3 ~1000ms

Most time is spend at the "Executing recipe html" step

nodejs: 16.13.2
jsreport: 3.4.1

How should I give other users the rights to use the version control via the commit button?

made pr https://github.com/jsreport/jsreport/pull/878

yes, i think blobStorage is missing from oracle? when i compare with mssql in the jsreport.config.js

When i set the blobStorage in the config to oracle as described in the migration guide I get an error at startup

  "store": {
    "provider": "oracle"
  },
  "blobStorage": {
    "provider": "oracle"
  },

error: Error occurred during reporter init: Error: options contain values that does not match the defined full root schema. schema validation errors: rootOptions.blobStorage.provider should be equal to one of the allowed values. allowed values: ["memory"]

Is this a bug or am i doing something wrong?

Is it possible to use multiple config files ?

e.g.

• jsreport.config.json -> default configuration

And then one of the following on top of the default config

• dev.config.json
• tst.config.json
• stg.config.json
• prod.config.json

It seems that I can only provide one configFile by argument, and when using the jsreport.config.json file is not used.