Topics created by MI53RE19

Works like a charm, thanks a lot!!

Thanks a lot for your time,

I have to deeply apologize on my end as I finally figured out what was wrong :
the images url list (arround 8k) that was being used was not fully completed during the data generation (arround 4k only)
hence the recipe would call undefined instead of a proper https://link-to-img, which explain why no more
image where shown after a certain point in the PDF.
After fixing the data to contains proper url I could generate correctly the whole PDF with all the images as it should be.

The good point for us in this process is that we could find out about how chrome-pdf would handle this case and we are quite hapy about it since we still get a PDF at the end. The bad point is that it took too much time for both of us and I do apologize again for that.

Thanks a lot for your help!

thanks @MI53RE19 for the details! hope you can solve the problem. and we can't wait to release v2 😀

Thanks a lot for the fix!
Will proceed asap to the upgrade!

Thank you for the info. I'm happy that my 3 hours of rancher installation wasn't a waste. :)

I've updated the jsreport download section to give this hint for Rancher users.
https://jsreport.net/on-prem

@jan_blaha Thanks for letting me know!

A good way to improve (and save you time, maybe?) the table could be to let people be aware they can provide inputs they might be looking for?

Also, while I see that header and footer might not be supported by some receipe, how about their capacity to handle page numbers? and maybe how they do to handle it? (while I did proceed with phantom-pdf and wkhtmltopdf I cannot tell yet how about doing it with electron-pdf for example)

Again thanks a lot for your time!

If you need some help for testing count me in too!

I do recall not having it in 1.7.0 now that you mention it
Anyway, big thank for being so reactive!! :)

Wow thanks a lot!!

Will give you return if I find anything else:)

maybe it could be nice/useful to add those informations to the your documentation too? (because I'm sure people will ask about it soon or later!! xD)

sure! thanks for the follow up!

Yes that's the one, but it's ok now, I understand where I was misleading myself.
Sound so logic now that you mention it!

Thank you very much for your help!

Thank you for confirmation. You can expect the fix in the next jsreport hotfix.

Good news.
There is now a custom jsreport extension which can sign pdf outputs.
https://jsreport.net/learn/pdf-sign

Thanks a lot again!! Looking into it =)

You're welcome! always a pleasure to chat with your team! =)